Cybertruck Crash Test Ratings: Safety Analysis

The Tesla Cybertruck has been a topic of intense discussion, not just for its futuristic design and performance but also for its safety. As the Cybertruck rolls into the hands of customers, questions about its crashworthiness and safety ratings have taken center stage. This article dives deep into the crash test results, safety concerns, and what potential buyers need to know.

Crash Test Overview

Tesla’s In-House Testing

Tesla has conducted internal crash tests to ensure the Cybertruck complies with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). These tests include frontal impacts at 35 mph, side impacts at 38 mph, and rollover scenarios. While Tesla claims these tests demonstrate the Cybertruck’s safety for both occupants and pedestrians, the results have not been independently verified by organizations like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) or the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).

Lack of Independent Ratings

As of now, neither NHTSA nor IIHS has officially tested the Cybertruck. It is not included in NHTSA’s 2024 or 2025 five-star safety ratings program, and IIHS has no immediate plans to evaluate it unless consumer interest increases significantly. This lack of independent testing leaves a gap in understanding how the Cybertruck performs compared to other vehicles in its class.

Key Findings from Tesla’s Tests

Frontal Impact

• The Cybertruck’s rigid stainless steel exoskeleton absorbs minimal impact energy, raising concerns about transferring crash forces directly to occupants.
• Airbags deployed as expected, but experts worry about the lack of traditional crumple zones.

Side Impact

• Reinforced door structures and side airbags provided good protection during Tesla’s tests.
• However, real-world accidents have shown significant cabin intrusion in side collisions.

Rollover Test

• The Cybertruck’s low center of gravity, thanks to its battery placement, reduces rollover risk. However, its angular design complicates rescue operations in severe crashes.

Safety Concerns

Pedestrian Safety

The Cybertruck’s tall front end and angular design pose heightened risks to pedestrians. Studies show that vehicles with high hoods and rigid structures are more likely to cause severe injuries or fatalities in pedestrian collisions. Critics have labeled it a “death machine” due to these design aspects.

Crumple Zones

Traditional vehicles use crumple zones to absorb impact energy. The Cybertruck’s rigid stainless steel body lacks significant crumple zones, potentially increasing injury risks for both occupants and other vehicles involved in crashes.

Rescue Challenges

The ultra-hard stainless steel body and armored glass make it difficult for first responders to access the cabin in emergencies. Tools like the “jaws of life” may struggle against such materials.

Advanced Safety Features

Despite structural concerns, Tesla equips the Cybertruck with advanced safety technologies:

• Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB)
• Lane Departure Warning
• Crash Imminent Braking
• Dynamic Brake Support.

These features aim to prevent accidents rather than mitigate their consequences.

Real-World Accidents

Several real-world incidents involving the Cybertruck have raised questions about its safety:

• A T-bone collision revealed significant cabin deformation on impact.
• A fatal crash involving a fire highlighted challenges with battery safety and emergency response.
• In minor accidents, the Cybertruck’s rigid structure caused disproportionate damage to other vehicles while sustaining minimal harm itself.

Comparisons with Competitors

Feature	Tesla Cybertruck	Ford F-150 Lightning
Body Material	Stainless Steel	Aluminum
Crumple Zones	Limited	Extensive
Pedestrian Safety	High Risk	Moderate Risk
Independent Testing	Not Yet Tested	Fully Tested

While Tesla emphasizes durability and occupant protection, competitors like Ford balance these with better pedestrian safety and crash energy absorption.

What Experts Say

Safety professionals are divided:

• Some praise Tesla’s innovation but call for independent testing to validate claims.
• Others criticize the design as prioritizing aesthetics over safety, particularly for vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists.

Elon Musk remains confident in the Cybertruck’s safety, asserting it will outperform other trucks in both occupant and pedestrian protection. However, this confidence is yet to be substantiated by third-party evaluations.

FAQs

1. Does the Tesla Cybertruck have a five-star safety rating?
No. The Cybertruck has not been officially tested by NHTSA or IIHS for a five-star rating.

2. What makes the Cybertruck unique in crash tests?
Its stainless steel exoskeleton provides exceptional durability but lacks traditional crumple zones, raising concerns about occupant and pedestrian safety.

3. Are there any recalls related to safety?
Yes. Tesla recalled several Cybertrucks due to issues with accelerator pedals potentially causing unintended acceleration.

4. How does it compare to other trucks?
The Cybertruck emphasizes durability over traditional safety features like crumple zones, making it less forgiving in collisions compared to competitors like the Ford F-150 Lightning.

Conclusion

The Tesla Cybertruck is undoubtedly a groundbreaking vehicle with innovative features and a bold design. However, its crash test ratings remain inconclusive due to a lack of independent evaluations. While Tesla’s internal tests suggest strong occupant protection, concerns about pedestrian safety and structural rigidity persist. Potential buyers should weigh these factors carefully and stay tuned for updates as more data becomes available.

For now, the Cybertruck stands as a symbol of innovation—but one that comes with unanswered questions about its real-world safety performance.